Wednesday, October 16, 2019
What is not "logical" about cover crops?
Dr.
Mark Greenspan begins his recent article on cover crop selection (Wine Business
Monthly, October 2019, https://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/ ) by describing what species of cover crops to utilize in
vineyards. He restricts his comments for application/consideration in “wetter
growing regions”, as dry winter regions are “challenging, or borderline
impossible” places to establish cover crops. Dr. Greenspan continues: “…using additional water to grow a cover crop that sucks up more water from the
ground in a dry climate does not seem desirable or logical”. Dr. Greenspan lists the many benefits of cover crops in vineyards: mitigation of soil
compaction, erosion reduction, improved water infiltration, improved soil
organic matter, increased soil aeration, providing substrate (food?) for soil
microbiota, moderating vineyard microclimate and reduction of dust and mites, adding nitrogen to the soil (legumes) and the support
of beneficial insects…not to mention the aesthetic appeal of flowering cover
crops. These cover crop benefits sound like they are,... well, beneficial.
This question, or
comparison of cost:benefit ratio deserves quantification and a scientific
accounting here in New Mexico. NMSU Viticulture PhD graduate student, Ms.
Jacqueline Cormier, has established several cover crop plots in the Malbec
vineyard at Fabian Garcia ASC in Las Cruces, to systematically investigate this
cover crop cost:benefit ratio question. Bear in mind that several New Mexico
winegrowers have been using cover crops for years, and clearly believe their
benefits are worth the cost and effort. We look forward to Ms. Cormier’s
empirical results. I suggest you go to the Wine Business Monthly website and read Dr. Greenspan's article for yourself.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment