GRAPE PRUNING New
Mexico State University Winter 2019 - Spring 2020
Gill Giese, Extension Viticulture Specialist ggiese@nmsu.edu
Pruning is arguably the most
important cultural practice a grape grower performs. Pruning has a dwarfing (pruned
vines are physically smaller) and invigorating
(the vigor of remaining growing points is increased) effect on the vine. When
wood is removed, the roots that previously supported the top growth will have
an abundance of hormones and carbohydrate reserves. The roots will also have an
increased water and mineral absorbance capacity relative to the remaining top
growth. This increased capacity or ‘excess supply’ stimulates the remaining
shoots to grow and expand at a rapid rate. The rate of growth over time is referred to as “vigor”. Vigor is not the
total amount of growth, or overall vine/plant size. To summarize thus far: the above
ground portion of pruned vines are physically smaller and the remaining shoots
grow more rapidly (increased vigor) compared to shoots on an unpruned vine.
A
term often confused with vigor is “vine capacity”. Vine capacity relates to vine size, and is a separate concept.
Capacity is the total amount of fruit/crop a given vine can support to a
desired degree of maturity. Vine productivity and sustainability depends on
vine capacity: first, for the vine’s physiological requirements and second, for
the economic viability of the vineyard enterprise. At pruning, the following is
determined: type, position and number of buds that will produce fruit. Bud
number, that impacts crop load, is set at pruning and can impact berry
composition i.e. fruit ‘quality’. Thus, pruning plays a crucial role in vine health
and productivity.
Purpose
of pruning: achieve the desired amount and quality of fruit over a
number of years.
1. Set the appropriate fruit load to
the size/capacity of each vine
2. Shape and train the vine,
integrating the vine to a given trellis system. Direct vine growth into a
well-spaced canopy that allows air, sunlight and spray materials into the
canopy, to contact the foliage and fruit at the optimum time and degree during
the growing season. Within this goal, one should keep in mind not just the
current upcoming fruiting season but subsequent seasons. Ideally, this multiple
year outlook informs how you shape or set-up the vine for the long term.
Balanced vine growth
begins with pruning: How many buds to leave?
1. Weigh pruned, one-year old
wood. Leave 30 buds for the first lb. removed and 10 buds for every lb.
thereafter. This is called the 30+10 formula, and is applied to Concord and
other American varieties. Another formula, leaves 20 buds per 1 lb. of wood
removed and is the ‘formula’ for many vinifera
or European wine grapes. These ‘formulas’ provide a starting place and are not
definitive…they are an aid to matching pruned wood with the fruit crop. Balanced pruning is a technique that
uses: cane weight (one-year old wood), node counting and a pruning ‘formula’
for estimating vine capacity. Dr. Nelson Shaulis of Cornell University
developed this technique in the middle of the 20th century. It
assumes the selection of well-exposed canes with fruitful buds. Each pruning formula,
or nodes per pound of canes, is driven by growth and fruiting characteristics
of the variety. Vine capacity varies between trellis/training systems and between
adjoining vines in a row. The intent of balanced pruning and/or a ‘formula’, is
to avoid over or under-pruning vines of differing capacity. Balanced pruning is
the first step in achieving the annual desired quality level with maintained or
improved vine capacity for the following year’s crop (Coombe and Dry, 1992).
Example
bud number formulas:
Variety Formula
Cabernet
Sauvignon 20+20 Concord 30+10
Cabernet
Franc 20+20 Niagara 40+10
Chardonnay 20+20
Riesling 20+20
Seyval 5+10
Vidal 15+10
Other
Hybrids 20+10
2.
Leaf
area: fruit ratio, a measure of a vine’s capacity:
The
leaf area to fruit ratio is defined as: Pn (photosynthetically active) leaf
area measured in square centimeters (cm2) to mass, measured in grams
(g). This ratio depends on the trellis system used. The vertical shoot
positioned (VSP) trellis generates a leaf area:fruit ratio of about 0.8 to 1.2
m2 leaf area per kg fruit or about 10 cm2 of leaf area
per 2g of fruit, or about 5-6 mature leaves per each medium sized cluster
(Figure 1). Divided canopies can be a bit more efficient, where 0.5 to 0.8 m2/kg
are needed to mature fruit (Kliewer and Dokoozlian, 2005). Efficiency here is defined
as the least amount of leaf area that is required to mature a given amount of
fruit.
Figure
1. The relationship of leaf area to crop weight. Examples of three trellis
systems: A1 = vertical, B1 = lyre and C1 = Geneva double curtain, (Kliewer and
Dokoozlian, 2005).
3. If vines have 3.5 lbs. of
prunings/vine, one should leave about 42 buds as a default, 6 buds/ft., or 2-3 spurs
per foot. What if one must choose between total number of buds/vine and achieving
the desired number of shoots per foot? In this case, the number of buds per
foot takes precedence over the total number of buds per vine. Avoid a shoot
density per foot that results in a dense and congested canopy, that leads to
increased disease pressure and poor light exposure of fruit clusters.
4. Wood:fruit ratio should be
approximately 5-6 lbs. of fruit per 1 lb. of wood removed.
Factors that impact
pruning…or, pruning depends on:
1. Climate: Is your climate continental or maritime? If continental (BTW: all of New Mexico has a continental
climate), there is an increased chance of winter and/or frost injury due to
wide swings in night and day temperatures and no dampening effect from large
bodies of water. In this case consider:
-
Leaving
more buds at pruning time and shoot and crop thin later in the season
-
Prune
late, to delay budburst and aid avoidance of frost injury in the spring
-
“kicker
canes” are ‘extra’ canes left on the vine, that can enter budburst relatively
late. Kicker canes can be used to replace spur borne buds killed by frost. Kicker
canes are typically replaced each year and help dissipate excess vine vigor or
be positioned to serve as a replacement trunk if needed.
2.
Soil Fertility:
- deep soil = vigorous growth, prune light
(leave many buds) to increase rate
of early shoot growth
- poor soil = prune severely (leave few buds)
to stimulate vigor in remaining
buds
3. Variety:
pay attention to number of: bunches/shoot, flowers/cluster, berry weight,
and
bud position
- some varieties have sterile basal buds,
example: Nebbiolo, some have many
basal buds that will not be counted
at pruning time that can burst and grow
later leading to a congested canopy.
-
apical dominance? Phenomenon most
evident in the spring, where the buds
at cane tips
break bud first, and subsequently, buds
located closer to cordon or trunk will
burst.
One can use this to advantage by leaving
longer spurs and after the apical
buds reach
bud burst, they are pruned off …this
will delay budbreak in remaining buds
and could help avoid a late frost.
4. Economic: winter pruning most
economical way to control crop, but is least
precise method of crop control
- cluster, fruit and shoot thinning during the
growing season costs more, but is
more precise compared to winter or dormant pruning
Pruning Procedures
1. Timing:
-
Early
prune to finish pruning by budburst, this may be dictated by size of vineyard
and number of pruners available. Pruning can be done after budburst, but the risk of bud damage is greater because the
process can damage of knock off the tender growing buds.
-
Early
pruning = early bud break, growth advancement can persist through harvest
-
Double
pruning = making two passes through the vineyard.
o First pass, make rough cuts and
remove bulk of the prunings from the trellis
o Second pass, adjust bud numbers to
desired number/vine prior to bud break
-
Delayed
pruning, cutting off wood as budburst approaches, development of remaining buds
will be delayed
o The delay can persist through
harvest
o Delayed pruning can reduce Eutypa,
Esca and other wood rotting diseases.
Figure
2. Left: a cross section of a cordon infected with fungal wood rotting disease,
evident in the discoloration. Right:
end cut cordon revealing fungal wood rotting infection.
2. Pruning
Degree:
-
Balanced
pruning: number of buds retained based on weight of wood removed at annual
dormant pruning
o
SEVERE
< 20 buds left on the vine
o
MODERATE 20 to 70 buds left on vine
o
LIGHT > 75 buds left on the
vine
3. Cane
Selection Criteria:
- varietal color: light
brown Vitis vinifera varieties, with
brown coloration to
the cane tip
-
1 cm (3/8 inch) in diameter desired,
strive for cane uniformity
-
moderate internode length, about 3-4
inches
- round buds instead of flat buds
- canes of
different length and diameter, should retain different number of
buds
- age or location
4. Vine Age: different training goals for
different age vines
- young
vines – establishment of framework based on trunk arrangement
- mature
– framework and buds type placement within your trellis system
Pruning affects most vineyard activities
and vine growth parameters such as: crop yield, winter hardiness, insect and disease
management and ultimately berry composition and resultant juice and wine
quality (Chapman et al. 2004). Although pruning can become intuitive once you
have practiced a bit, a winegrower with an eye towards the bottom line should
maintain good records to supplement and support her pruning decisions.
REFERENCES
1.
Chapman, D.M., Matthews, M.A., and J.X. Guinard. 2004. Sensory
Attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon Wines Made from Vines with Different Crop
Yields. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55: 325-334.
2. Coombe, B.G., and P.R. Dry. 1992. Viticulture
Volume 2, Practices. Winetitles. Adelaide, Australia
3. Fisher, H.K. 1999. Factors
Affecting Successful Vine Growth, Yield and Quality., Wine Industry Workshop,
Geneva NY
4. Howell, G.S. 2001. Sustainable
Grape Productivity and the Growth-Yield Relationship: A Review.
Am.J. Enol. Vitic. 52:3 165-174.
5. Kliewer, W. M. and N. Dokoozlian.
2005. Leaf Area/Crop Weight Ratios of Grapevines: Influence on Fruit
Composition and Wine Quality. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:170-181.
6. Pool, R.M. 2004. Vineyard Balance-
What Is It? Can It Be Achieved? Acta.Hort.
640, ISHS p 285-302.
7.
Winkler,
A.J., Cook, J.A., Kliewer, W.M., and L.A. Lider. 1974. General Viticulture. University
of California Press, Berkeley.